Whangarei Accountants - Elevate CA - Tax, Xero, Business Development, Accounting

Whangarei Accountants serving Northland, Auckland and Whangarei Loving what we do: bringing fresh energy and innovative thinking to your business! Phone 09 430 0910.

  • Home
  • Budget 2020
  • Business Post COVID-19
  • Events
  • Contact
  • CloudCA

Payments for hurt and humiliation – asymmetric tax treatment

141117 - asymetric iconQ: When is a payment tax deductible to your business but tax free in the hands of your employee?

A: When the payment is for hurt and humiliation caused by the employer.

This may seem at first glance like an opportunity for tax arbitrage – notwithstanding the high price in terms of your reputation as an employer.

The IRD has confirmed in Public Ruling BR Pub 06/05 that genuine compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity, or injury to feelings is not taxable to the employee. It matters not whether the compensation is determined by the Courts or is an out-of-court settlement agreed by the parties.   Regardless of the payments being non-taxable to the employee, they are likely to be tax deductible to the employer.

Due to this one sided tax treatment, payments for hurt and humiliation have become an area of focus for the IRD. It is well worth having some background knowledge to the tax treatment of payments to employees who have a legitimate personal grievance.

Payments for lost income, redundancy entitlements, or exit inducements are taxable and are subject to PAYE just the same as ordinary salaries and wages are. Simply reclassifying a payment as being for hurt and humiliation and getting the settlement agreement signed by an independent mediator does not make the payment non-taxable.

In order to stack up as genuine compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity, or injury to feelings – and as such be legitimately non-taxable to the employee, the parties would need to be able to demonstrate to the IRD the following: 

  1. That the employee had a genuine personal grievance , and;

  2. That the amount paid to the employee was reasonable based on the level of compensation awarded by the Courts in similar scenarios.

The onus for getting this right is with the employer. If the IRD were to later investigate the transaction and deem that there was no genuine personal grievance – or that the payment was excessive, they would likely seek to “gross-up” the payment to calculate the PAYE liability. As a result, the employer would be assessed for the unpaid PAYE – plus penalties and interest.

Although the employee may be highly motivated to have payments classified in a not taxable manner, the costs of getting it wrong fall entirely on the employer’s shoulders – so care must obviously be taken in this area. Because of the asymmetrical tax treatment and opportunities for abuse, payments for hurt and humiliation will likely continue to be an area of focus for the IRD.

You Might Also Enjoy Reading

  • Hiring a Xero-Savvy Accountant - 20th February, 2017
  • Christmas Break - Office Reopening 11 January 2016 - 11th December, 2015
  • Returning Kiwis with Australian Rental Properties - 26th May, 2015
  • Valuation of your Business - 23rd May, 2015
  • Changes for Companies - 22nd May, 2015
avatar

About Tim Chapman

Tim Chapman is a Chartered Accountant on the ElevateCA team. Tim is our resident Xero expert - and is skilled in tax and accounting matters. See Tim's full profile here ....

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Avatars by Sterling Adventures

Copyright © 2021 · Elevate CA Limited. Chartered Accountants and Business Specialists · Login