Whangarei Accountants - Elevate CA - Tax, Xero, Business Development, Accounting

Whangarei Accountants serving Northland, Auckland and Whangarei Loving what we do: bringing fresh energy and innovative thinking to your business! Phone 09 430 0910.

  • Home
  • Careers
  • Contact

Fishhook in the 90 Day Trial Period

Business owners will be aware that from 1 April, the 90 day trial provisions have been extended to cover all workplaces.  Previously this provision was available only in workplaces with fewer than 20 employees.

But many business owners may not be aware of this potential snag:

If you wish to include a 90 day trial period in your employment agreement, you must ensure the employment agreement is signed before your new employee steps foot on your premises to start work.

 

Consider the recent Employment Court case Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy (2009) Limited. Heather Smith was provided with a draft employment agreement by her prospective employer on 29 September which included a 90 day trial period.  She accepted the position on the basis of the draft employment agreement, and started work on 1 October.  But she did not actually sign her employment agreement until the next day – 2 October.

 

If everyone had lived happily at Stokes Valley Pharmacy for at least 90 days, we would have no cause to discuss the nitty gritty of Heather Smith’s employment on this page.  But all did not go well – and Heather Smith was dismissed on 8 December under the 90 day trial provision in her employment agreement.

Stokes Valley Pharmacy relied on the 90 day trial period for comfort that Heather Smith would not be able to bring a personal grievance in respect of the dismissal.  But after her dismissal, she did attempt to lodge a personal grievance.  And despite the fact that Heather Smith and Stokes Valley Pharmacy had a signed employment agreement with a 90 day trial period, the Employment Court ruled that she was entitled to bring a personal grievance. 

The Court stated that under the Employment Relations Act, trial periods only apply to “an employee who has not been previously employed by the employer”.  Because Heather Smith had worked for one day before signing her employment agreement, she was an existing employee at the time she signed up for the 90 day trial period.  And therefore Stokes Valley Pharmacy could not rely on the trial provisions.

There were some other complicating issues in the Heather Smith case, but the one point from the case I want to make is this:

Regardless of whether you include a trial period, always ensure you have a signed employment agreement with a new team member before they step foot on your premises to start work for the first time. 

And if your new team member has worked even for one day before signing onto the 90 day trial period – or if a past employee applies for a job in your business – then the 90 day trial provision cannot be used.

As best practice, we would suggest you go one step further and make it very clear at the time a job offer is made that it will be subject to a 90 day trial period.  Remember that the 90 day trial period provisions do not apply by default – a trial period must be explicitly agreed up front and clearly stated in the employment agreement.

 

 

 

Financial year end – 2011

 

For most of our clients, 31 March is the end of the financial year – and time to start organising your records for the year.  Here is the process for getting your financial statements compiled this year: 

Traditionally, accountants send annual questionnaires around this time as a guide to help their clients compile complete financial records.  Last year we trialled on-line electronic questionnaires which tailored themselves to your specific business by only asking you questions that were relevant based on your answers to earlier questions.  For example if yours is a service business, you’re not going to be asked about closing stock. 

This trial was largely successful and most clients reported that it made the process simpler.  And we have made some changes to the system in response to some of the issues that arose during the trial.  So the on-line questionnaires are part of the new normal this year.  But if you’re using a dial-up internet connection, this process might be frustrating – so let us know and we’ll send you a paper based document instead. 

Once you have completed your on-line questionnaire – and we have received any supporting files and information, we’ll be in a position to start working on your end of year financial statements.  Here’s how it works at our end:

Our aim is to meet your particular deadline.  If you’d like your annual work completed within a certain timeframe or in a certain month, just let us know.  We can meet your deadline within reason whether you are thinking of selling, admitting a shareholder, if the bank needs your accounts, if you need an immediate accurate picture of your tax going forward – or if you just can’t sleep until your year end is sorted.

 

We don’t start work unless we have all the information and records needed to finish the job.  Picking up and putting down work is inefficient – and it opens up the possibility for errors.   

 

Once we have started a job, we aim to have it finished quickly and efficiently – almost certainly within the month it was started.

 

Once we have prepared draft financial statements and a draft tax position, we will typically email you a copy of the drafts and make a time to meet with you to run through the results before they are finalised.  This meeting is often where the real value is added. 

We’re looking forward to working with you in preparation of your 2011 financial statements – and of course on all the other projects that continue regardless of the annual compliance season.

Review of LAQCs

We’ll be completing our review of all QC and LAQC clients over the next few weeks.  From the start of the next financial year, LAQCs will no longer be able to attribute their losses to shareholders.

The Government’s strategy behind these changes is to prevent ‘arbitrage’ – the ability for an LAQC to pass losses out to shareholders where they can be used at the shareholder’s marginal tax rate of up to 33% – while retaining any profits in the company where from 1 April they will be taxed at only 28%.

So the new legislation arising from last year’s budget announcement introduces the “Look Through Company” (LTC), which will allow allocation of the company’s losses to shareholders in proportion to their shareholding in a similar fashion as existing LAQCs.  But it also requires that profits are taxed in the hands of shareholders resulting in more equal treatment of losses and profits.

The new LTC is an option for people who currently hold loss making businesses or investments in LAQCs.  Shareholders are able to elect for their existing LAQC or newly incorporated company to become an LTC between 1 April and 30 September 2011.

Here is a brief summary of the most significant changes and implications:

  • As of 1 April 2011, LAQCs will not be able to attribute losses to shareholders.
  • A new tax entity, called a Look Through Company (LTC) is now created.  Profits and losses (but with some limitations) are passed on to its shareholders.  This means that losses and profits will be deducted or taxed at the shareholders’ marginal tax rate.
  • Losses in LTCs will only flow through to its shareholders to the extent of the shareholder’s investment in the company (including the share of any debt guaranteed by that shareholder).
  • The shareholders of an LTC will be treated as holding the assets of that LTC directly.  If they sell their shares in an LTC they will therefore be treated as disposing of their interest in the underlying company property (subject to some exceptions) and will therefore be up for any associated tax consequences.  Examples are depreciation recovered and gains on the sale of trading stock.
  • If the company exits the LTC regime (which could happen unintentionally) a disposal of the company assets will be deemed to have happened and this will possibly give rise to negative tax consequences.
  • LTCs will not pay income tax as all income will be attributed to shareholders and those shareholders will be responsible for their own tax.
  • LTCs can only have one class of shares.

But having said all that, the above is merely a tax fiction.  An LTC retains its identity as a registered company with limited liability and therefore is still governed by the Companies Act 1993.

The options for those currently operating QCs and LAQCs include the following:

  • The default option – which in most cases is unlikely to be the best option – will be to continue as a QC without the ability to attribute losses to shareholders.
  • Revoking LAQC status and being taxed as an ordinary company.
  • Electing to become an LTC as detailed above.
  • Becoming a partnership or a sole trader. Special rules will allow this transition without a tax cost – although if property is involved there will be significant conveyancing, legal and bank costs.

Some of the issues we’re considering during these reviews are these:  If the company owns assets of any sort, how long do you intend to own them?  Do you intend to introduce other shareholders in the future – or to transfer shares into your trust at any point?  Does the company’s activity generate losses?  How long might these losses continue – particularly given the changes to depreciation rules?  What is your actual economic investment in the LAQC and how might this change in the future?

Depending on our recommendations after reviewing your QC or LAQC, we may make use of the transitional rules and tax concessions which will enable us to transition QCs and LAQCs across to an LTC, a partnership, a limited partnership or a sole trader.    We will need to file election documentation with IRD for all LAQCs that are to become LTCs, as well as give written notice to IRD for any LAQCs that choose to transition to another entity type.

For those LAQCs where the recommendation is to transition to another entity type rather than become an LTC, there will be administrative tasks and potentially restructuring and legal costs and issues such as:

  • Ensuring that current finance terms are not adversely affected
  • Transferring commercial contracts and banking arrangements to the new entity
  • The legal transfer of businesses/assets to the new entity with its associated legal costs
  • The transfer of employment agreements across to the new entity
  • Potentially a raft of Inland Revenue registrations and deregistrations
  • Transfer of all insurance covers
  • Informing suppliers of the new entity so that you hold valid tax invoices
  • Deciding whether the LAQC should be liquidated, or registered as a non-active company, or left as a shell company

Unfortunately this is not as simple as just transferring all of our QC and LAQC clients across to the LTC regime as this would create real tax disadvantages for some.  And nor is doing nothing likely to be the best option for all clients.  If you have any queries or concerns, do contact us.

Elevate CA are Hiring

 

Elevate CA are growing, and we’re looking for just the right accountant to join our team.     

 

Who are Elevate CA? 

We are new, we are different and we are growing fast.   We are small enough to be nimble – and we are willing to take a risk to try innovative ways to deliver better value and service to our clients.   We are a relaxed team – but highly focussed on providing fantastic value and service to our clients.  And we’re a very long way from the traditional accounting “factory”.   

We embrace innovation and change as a positive rather than avoiding it as a threat to “the way things are done around here”.  We have up-to-the-minute IT, we are marketing focussed, and are always looking for opportunities to connect our business clients with each other.

We are members of the NZ Institute of Chartered Accountants – and if you’re completing PCEI or PCEII, we have a registered mentor on the team.  

 

Who we’re looking for? 

We need a person who is up to speed in the industry right now.  You’ll need to have been employed as an accountant in an NZ Chartered Accounting business for at least the past three years.  And equally important is the attitude to thrive in the unique way we operate.

If you can tick those boxes – and if you like what you see on this website, please read on.  This could be a great opportunity for you.

A partial accounting qualification – and knowledge of the “Accountants Office” software would be a real advantage.  But  we know that we can’t have everything, so if your CV is missing either of those, it won’t necessarily be a deal killer. 

 

The position 

This is a full time position based in our CBD Whangarei office, with plenty of client contact.  Here’s what you’ll be doing: 

1. preparation of financial statements and tax returns from source documents;

2. playing a key role in managing our relationship with clients, other professionals and the IRD. 

 

While the focus of this position will always be producing outstanding results for our clients, we pull together as a team to do what is required – so this will not be a role defined strictly by the letter of a job description.    

 

Taking it further 

If you’re the person we have described here, we’d very much like to hear from you.   Here’s how to grab hold of this opportunity:

 

1.  If you have been employed as an accountant in an NZ Chartered Accounting business for at least the past three years – and you like what you see on this website, proceed straight to step two without delay!

2.  Email your CV to goingUP@elevateCA.co.nz before 15 April.  We want to know about your CA experience, where you’re working right now, the kind of work you’re doing – and any questions you may have.  You can count on our complete confidentiality. 

3.  We will move quickly.  You’ll hear from us straight away to acknowledge receipt of your CV – and to arrange interviews where applicable.   

4.  Start date will be to suit – and you’ll be very busy from day one! 

 

Thank you for taking an interest in joining the Elevate CA team!

 

Residential Property Depreciation – after 1 April 2011

 

It was no great surprise when last year’s budget removed the ability to claim depreciation on most buildings from 1 April 2011.  The Government had clearly signaled its intention to remove some incentives for Kiwis to invest in residential property – and depreciation was flagged as one of these.

So from 1 April 2011, depreciation won’t be available as a tax deduction for most buildings.  Rather clear-cut at first glance.

But when does an item in a residential rental property become a separate chattel that can be depreciated in its own right?

Good question – and one that we are asked often.  We see all sorts of opinion from aggressive splitting of every last component through to the conservative view that depreciation is no longer an option.  Here’s a three step guide to help find an answer:

 

Step 1:  Determine whether the item is in some way attached or connected to the building.  If it is completely unattached, it will likely continue to be depreciable even after 1 April 2011.

Step 2:  If the item is attached, is it an integral part of the building?  Would the property be incomplete without the item? If the answer to these questions is yes, the item is an integral part of the building and unable to be depreciated from 1 April.  If the item is not an integral part of the building, go to step 3.

Step 3:  Is the item attached or connected to the building in a way that it’s part of the “fabric” of the building.  Consider the degree of attachment, the difficulty involved in removal and whether removal would result in significant damage to the item or the building.

 

So what does this mean?

It is clear that the likes of plumbing, electrical wiring, internal walls, doors and kitchen units are part of the building and cannot be depreciated separately.  The property would be incomplete without these.

At the other end of the range of possibilities, it is clear that items like fridges or heaters that can be unplugged and taken away are separate assets.  These can continue to be depreciated.  The same would apply to curtains and blinds which can be easily removed without damage.

But where it gets a bit gray is with the likes of carpets, bathroom cupboards or hot water cylinders. 

If a bathroom cupboard is attached to the wall by only a few screws and can be easily removed without damage, it is likely a separate asset.  Similarly carpet can usually be easily removed without damage – and many rental properties have bare floor boards.  So we would be comfortable to continue depreciating carpets separately.  And hot water cylinders are usually attached only to the power and water supplies – so we would consider these to be separately depreciable.

Check with us before applying this to your own situation as each set of circumstances can throw out a different answer.  But the point here is that despite the changes announced in the budget, all is not lost.  There is still potentially some room to depreciate the chattels in your residential rental property.

 

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2025 · Elevate CA Limited. Chartered Accountants and Business Specialists · Login