Whangarei Accountants - Elevate CA - Tax, Xero, Business Development, Accounting

Whangarei Accountants serving Northland, Auckland and Whangarei Loving what we do: bringing fresh energy and innovative thinking to your business! Phone 09 430 0910.

  • Home
  • Careers
  • Contact

Archives for March 2013

Protecting your business when things go wrong (Newmarket)

 

Without a certain appetite for risk, most business owners would instead be happily employed in someone else’s business.  But of course where there is risk, the worst can happen.

Being a business owner involves a mix of risk and reward.  The prudent director is mindful of the risks inherent in his or her business – and takes appropriate steps to mitigate these by good planning and forethought.  This is the topic for the May Business Owners Forum event in Newmarket.

We are not talking here about risks that are commonly insured such as fire, theft, public liability and loss of a key person.  This event is not about insurance – rather, it will focus on those risks that fall entirely on the business to identify and manage ahead of things going wrong.

There are a wide array of things that can go wrong for businesses – and risks to one business might be irrelevant to the next business.  But there are patterns – and there are usually good strategies that business owners can put in place to mitigate the effects of these risks.  The objective of managing risk is to ensure your business is protected when things go wrong.

This event will be held at the BNZ Partners facility on Broadway, Newmarket at 5:30pm on Wednesday 15 May 2013 – and will run through to 7:30pm on the night.  This event will be more or less a repeat of the 18 April event in North Harbour.

Selina-Jane Trigg.  Selina is principal of law firm Family Law Results, based in CBD Auckland and Papakura.  She has specialised in family law for 16 years – and is a self-described “Family Law Geek”.  Selina’s work includes advising clients on avoiding the risks to their businesses in the event of  death or separation.  High on the list of bad news she has to deliver to her clients is that their family trust is not the protection they thought it was!  Selina will entertain, inform and frighten.

Damien Grant.  As an insolvency practitioner, Damien is every day involved in the aftermath of “things going wrong” for businesses.  Damien has pretty much seen it all – and he knows the patterns, precursors and predictors of business carnage when he sees them.  Damien will share some of these at this event – and his insights are sure to resonate with business owners.

Keith Ward.  Keith is a business man who has had some successes and some challenges.  Keith ran Recycle Boutique, owned Maggazino and was one of the founders of the Breakers, but came unstuck with a perfect storm of unrelated events.  He has truly walked through the shadow of death and has spent some time in the care of the Official Assignee.  Keith’s story is a valuable one to all business owners.

As always for Business Owners Forum events, this session will be free of charge and completely free of sales pitches from the supporters or the panelists.  And there will be pizza, beer and wine to lubricate quality discussion.

Business Owners Forums are held monthly – alternating between Whangarei, Albany and Newmarket venues.  This event will be repeated in Newmarket on 15 May.

If you’d like to attend this event, email Fraser Hurrell before the end of 16 May.  And if you’d like to be included on the invite list for future events, just add your contact details in the box to the right.

Protecting your business when things go wrong (North Harbour)

Being a business owner involves a mix of risk and reward.  Without a certain appetite for risk, most business owners would instead be happily employed in someone else’s business.  But of course where there is risk, the worst can happen.

The prudent director is mindful of the risks inherent in his or her business – and takes appropriate steps to mitigate these by good planning and forethought.  This is the topic for the April Business Owners Forum event in Albany.

We are not talking here about risks that are commonly insured such as fire, theft, public liability and loss of a key person.  Rather, this event will focus on those risks that fall entirely on the business to identify and manage ahead of things going wrong.

There are a wide array of things that can go wrong for businesses – and risks to one business might be irrelevant to the next business.  But there are patterns – and there are usually good strategies that business owners can put in place to mitigate the effects of these risks.  The objective of managing risk is to ensure your business is protected when things go wrong.

This event will be held at the BNZ Partners facility on Constellation Drive, North Harbour at 5:30pm on Thursday 18 April 2013 – and will run through to 7:30pm on the night.

Here are the panellists for this event:

Selina-Jane Trigg.  Selina is principal of law firm Family Law Results, based in CBD Auckland and Papakura.  She has specialised in family law for 16 years – and is a self-described “Family Law Geek”.  Selina’s work includes advising clients on avoiding the risks to their businesses in the event of  death or separation.  High on the list of bad news she has to deliver to her clients is that their family trust is not the protection they thought it was!  Selina will entertain, inform and frighten.

Roger Hatrick-Smith.  As a consultant, Roger’s experience spans operations, supply chain, management and support processes.  He has provided strategic, business and financial advice as leader of Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneurial and Growth Markets Group and its Transaction Advisory service line in New Zealand.  Roger is Chief Financial Officer at the IceHouse, and will share some of the insights from his journey at this event.

Keith Ward.  Keith is a business man who has had some successes and some challenges.  Keith ran Recycle Boutique, owned Maggazino and was one of the founders of the Breakers, but came unstuck with a perfect storm of unrelated events.  He has truly walked through the shadow of death and has spent some time in the care of the Official Assignee.  Keith’s story is a valuable one to all business owners.

 

As always for Business Owners Forum events, this session will be free of charge and completely free of sales pitches from the supporters or the panelists.  And there will be pizza, beer and wine to lubricate quality discussion.

Business Owners Forums are held monthly – alternating between Whangarei, Albany and Newmarket venues.  This event will be repeated in Newmarket on 15 May.

If you’d like to attend this event, email Fraser Hurrell before the end of 16 April.  And if you’d like to be included on the invite list for future events, just add your contact details in the box to the right.

Should you spend $1 to save 28 cents?

 

There is no sense in paying $1 to save 28 cents, right?  At this time of year, we always get a number of calls from business owners exploring the idea of spending money on expenses their business doesn’t necessarily need in order to get a tax deduction.

But when your business does eventually need to spend some cash, there is a case at this time of year for bringing that expenditure forward to achieve a tax deduction a year earlier.

The general rule is that expenses can only be claimed in the year they are incurred – regardless of whether you might meet the costs earlier.  But there are some exceptions such as stationery, subscriptions to journals or periodicals, postage and courier costs, rates, road user charges and accounting fees.

But a potentially larger opportunity exists for the purchase of consumable aids.

Providing the cost of consumable aids on hand at balance date does not exceed $58,000, the cost of these may be claimed as a tax deduction in the year in which they are purchased – even if they are unused at balance date.   The goods must be in possession of the business at balance date – and the deduction for expenditure must not have been deferred to a subsequent income year for financial reporting purposes.

So it’s easy to see the opportunity here to bring forward some expenditure that your business will have to incur over the next few months anyway – and potentially bring forward a tax deductible expense of up to $58,000.  At the company tax rate of 28%, this effectively defers up to $16,240 of tax until the next year.

So what exactly are consumable aids?

Unhelpfully, the Income Tax Act does not define “consumable aids”, but here’s the IRD’s policy:  The Commissioner considers that consumable aids are goods or materials to which all of the following criteria apply:

• They are used in any way in the manufacture or production of goods or services from which a taxpayer derives assessable income.

• They are wholly or almost wholly consumed in the production process, or become unusable or worthless after being used once in the production process, or are capable of limited repetitive use, or have a very short life.

• They are not component parts of a finished product, or goods acquired for further processing.

Examples of consumable aids are the chemicals used by a plastic manufacturer, the printer ribbons used by an accountant, and the fertiliser used by a farmer.

Generally speaking these are items or materials which will not become part of the goods or services produced by your business – but which are used in the production of these goods or services. 

But be careful with this:  as soon as you breach the $58,000 threshold, the entire concession is lost.

Are you a New Zealand tax resident?

New Zealand tax residents pay tax in this county on their worldwide income.  This is a straightforward rule on the face of it – but what is a New Zealand tax resident?

Kiwis remain tax residents until they have been outside New Zealand for 325 days in any 12 month period – and have stopped having an “enduring relationship” with this country.

The 325 day test is easy – it’s just a question of fact.

But the question of an enduring relationship with New Zealand is more subjective.  One of the key planks of the enduring relationship question has always been the permanent place of abode test.  A person who retains a permanent place of abode is likely to also remain a New Zealand tax resident.  This has historically been considered along with factors such as where your immediate family live, where your children go to school, whether you belong to New Zealand professional bodies or sporting clubs, whether you have bank accounts or investments in this country or employment to return to on your return – and whether you have personal effects like cars, furniture or clothing retained here.

But the IRD have recently issued a draft Interpretation Statement (IS) which sets out the Commissioner’s latest views which have evolved considerably.  If finalised, this IS will result in many more Kiwis who are working offshore for a long period of time remaining as New Zealand tax residents for the duration of their time abroad. 

Under the draft IS, the notion of an “available dwelling” has greater emphasis.  Kiwis who retain a residential property in New Zealand are likely to be deemed to have an “available dwelling” – even if it is rented out to a long term tenant.  In order for the dwelling to be “available”, it will not be required that it is immediately available.  The dwelling may be a long term rental property that will never be personally occupied by the taxpayer or their family.

This is a tough departure from the IRD’s previous thinking in this area.

This draft IS will be of concern to Kiwis who are currently working offshore and who have considered themselves no longer New Zealand tax residents.  And it will be of concern to Kiwis who are considering leaving the country for a long stint abroad.  If you have retained residential property of any sort in this country, the likelihood is now greater that you will remain a New Zealand tax resident and therefore liable to pay tax here on your worldwide income.

Please call us if you are in either of these situations.

Using Imputation Credits at 30%

Would you pay $1,000 today rather than paying $1,667 later?  That’s a question many companies must answer before 31 March.

We have a window of opportunity until 31 March 2013 to declare dividends with Imputation Credits (ICs) attached at up to 30% depending on how much tax the company has actually paid.  ICs represent tax paid by the company, which can be attached to dividends thus reducing the amount of additional tax payable on the dividend income in the hands of the company’s shareholders.

After 31 March 2013, the maximum ICs that can be attached to dividends will drop to 28% – meaning an additional tax cost of 2% on dividends declared after 1 April 2013.

The downside is that Resident Withholding Tax (RWT) must be paid to the IRD on the 20th of the month following declaration of a dividend.  This tax is calculated as the difference between the ICs attached to the dividend – and the shareholder’s own tax rate, which is typically 33%.

In a nutshell. RWT on dividends declared before 31 March 2013 could be as low as 3% of the gross dividend – but payable on 20 April 2013.  And RWT on dividends declared after 1 April 2013 will likely be 5% of the gross dividend – but not payable until the 20th of the month following declaration of the dividend, which may be some time in the future.

A dividend can either be paid in cash if the company has the funds – or credited to the shareholders current accounts for later payment without further tax implications.

Please contact us if you’d like to discuss this in relation to your particular situation.

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Elevate CA Limited. Chartered Accountants and Business Specialists · Login